The risk with removing the Women, Peace, Security program
- Apr 30, 2025
- 1 min read
Updated: May 6, 2025
Removing the Women, Peace, Security (WPS) program is a dangerous move.
Providing the essential resources, tools, and training protocols tailored to the needs of the warrior ensures mission success. It is not favoritism or affirmative action--it's common sense.
Imagine wearing boots, helmets, and body armor that don't fit your body or how you move. How can you effectively defend your position and the lives of those around you?
I've heard countless stories during iGIANT roundtables of the harm that has been done and the time wasted trying to 'retrofit' equipment so that one can do their job well and safely.
We need to support those who defend us and that includes our women warriors.
To read more about this issue, check out this article on how the Army has been modernizing its uniforms and equipment to better fit and support female Soldiers, reflecting a broader shift toward inclusivity, personalization, and respect for diversity—putting people first in every thread and stitch.
The reaction should be as follows: when I read about the risks of canceling the Women, Peace, and Security program, I immediately remembered how my friend, who served in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, struggled for years with chronic pain in her back and legs due to improperly fitted equipment after suffering a serious injury and concussion. The same equipment problems mentioned in the post often lead to injuries that require long-term rehabilitation. That is why I am glad that there are now modern approaches — for example, here is a detailed description of the use of stem cells in military medicine to accelerate recovery from such injuries https://ways2well.com/blog/stem-cell-applications-in-military-medicine-advancing-recovery. This really helps people return to normal life faster, reduces inflammation,…